TL;DR
- The Verge categorizes AI companies like OpenAI under entertainment navigation
- Culture coverage splits into just TV Shows, Movies, and Audio subcategories
- Navigation structure prioritizes tech reviews over cultural criticism
- Site architecture reflects publication's tech-first editorial identity
Sometimes a website's navigation tells you everything about its priorities. The Verge, Vox Media's flagship tech publication, reveals its true nature not through mission statements but through dropdown menus. What they choose to categorize - and where - speaks volumes about how they see culture in 2024.
According to The Verge's navigation structure, the publication organizes its entertainment coverage into TV Shows, Movies, and Audio subcategories. That's it. Three buckets for the entire universe of cultural production. Meanwhile, their review categories get granular: Smart Home Reviews, Phone Reviews, Tablet Reviews, and Headphone Reviews each earn dedicated sections.
When AI Companies Become Entertainment
Here's where it gets weird. The Verge's entertainment section includes coverage of OpenAI and Anthropic under its AI category navigation, according to the site's structure. Let that sink in. The companies building large language models sit alongside movie reviews and TV recaps.
This isn't necessarily wrong - AI companies are increasingly part of our cultural conversation. But it reveals something fundamental about how The Verge sees the world. When your entertainment section treats AI labs like they're the next Marvel franchise, you're telling readers that technology isn't just part of culture. It is culture.
When your entertainment section treats AI labs like they're the next Marvel franchise, you're telling readers that technology isn't just part of culture. It is culture.
The navigation choices reflect a particular worldview. Gaming doesn't get its own entertainment subcategory (despite The Verge's extensive gaming coverage). Books don't exist as a navigation option. Comics, theater, art - all absent from the main menu structure. But you can find four different categories for reviewing gadgets.
The Architecture of Editorial Identity
Website navigation isn't neutral. It's editorial strategy made visible. Every dropdown menu represents a choice about what matters and what doesn't. The Verge's structure suggests a publication that sees culture primarily through screens - TV screens, movie screens, and the screens of the devices they review.
This makes sense for a tech publication. The Verge launched in 2011 as a technology site, and that DNA persists. But as they've expanded into cultural coverage, their navigation hasn't evolved to match. The result is a structure that can accommodate AI companies in entertainment sections but can't find room for dedicated gaming or book categories.
The social media footprint tells a similar story. According to the site, The Verge maintains presence across Facebook, Threads, Instagram, and YouTube - platforms that prioritize visual content and quick hits over deep cultural criticism.
What Gets Lost in Translation
The sparse entertainment categorization creates real problems for readers seeking cultural coverage. Want to find The Verge's take on the latest indie game or graphic novel? Good luck navigating a structure that only recognizes TV, Movies, and Audio as cultural categories. The site's search function becomes essential because the navigation won't help you.
This isn't about The Verge doing culture coverage badly. They publish smart criticism and thoughtful features. But their navigation structure suggests they haven't fully committed to being a culture publication. They're a tech site that also covers culture, and the architecture makes that hierarchy clear.
Navigation as Editorial Statement
- Tech reviews get 4+ dedicated categories
- Entertainment limited to 3 broad buckets
- AI companies classified as entertainment content
- Gaming, books, comics absent from main navigation
The most telling detail might be those four review categories for gadgets. Smart Home Reviews, Phone Reviews, Tablet Reviews, Headphone Reviews - each specific enough to help readers find exactly what they're looking for. Compare that granularity to "TV Shows, Movies, and Audio" for all of entertainment. One approach helps readers navigate; the other just sorts content into the broadest possible containers.
The Future of Tech-Culture Coverage
As technology and culture continue to merge, publications face a choice. Do they maintain traditional boundaries between tech and entertainment? Or do they acknowledge that the distinction barely exists anymore? The Verge's navigation suggests they're stuck between both approaches - treating AI as entertainment while maintaining rigid category structures inherited from an earlier internet.
The real question isn't whether The Verge should reorganize its dropdown menus. It's whether any publication can meaningfully separate technology from culture in 2024. When AI companies appear in entertainment sections, when streaming algorithms shape what shows get made, when social media platforms determine which artists succeed - maybe The Verge's confused navigation actually reflects a confused reality.
But that doesn't excuse the practical problem. Readers seeking culture coverage deserve better than three catch-all categories and AI companies mixed into entertainment feeds. Navigation should help people find what they're looking for, not force them to guess where gaming reviews might be hiding or whether book coverage even exists.
The Verge's navigation reveals a publication that knows exactly what it wants to be when covering technology - and hasn't quite figured out its cultural identity. That tension lives in every dropdown menu, every category choice, every decision about what deserves its own section and what gets lumped together. Until they resolve it, readers will keep wondering why finding a TV review requires wading past artificial intelligence companies. Sometimes the biggest editorial statements hide in the smallest design choices.
This article was drafted by a fictional editorial persona with AI assistance and reviewed by our human editorial team. Sources are cited throughout. How we use AI · Editorial standards
Discussion
Comments coming soon. Learn about our editorial process.